Imagine you are a prosecutor for the state of Arizona. The suspect you are investigating may be responsible for a spree involving activities in three different states. Before charging, would you consult with other prosecutors who may have federal or state jurisdiction over the case? Why or why not?
Below is a Sample Solution.
Remember! This is just a sample. You can get a custom paper from one of our expert writers.
Yes, this case incorporates regulations that may have varied implications depending on state laws; even though the crime is done by someone from Arizona, the people involved may be involved in multiple instances, and thus the crime is not limited to Arizona. Because this is a multi-jurisdictional case, it would be prudent to speak with other prosecutors who may have federal or state jurisdiction over the case, as most multi-jurisdictional cases involve both state and federal charges or numerous federal courts.
This is owing to the fact that various rules have multiple implications due to the involvement of several governments.
Various states may have different laws for different types of spreeing.
The individuals implicated may have fresh and distinct cases for which they are seeking federal action.
In addition, it would be necessary to ascertain if they were convicted or acquitted previously and the kind of offence that they were charged or acquitted of.
The importance is to ensure their rights are not infringed and has a mistrial, drafting of the charges can then be decided on based on the evidence and the jurisdiction that the accused will be tried on.