Explain whether you think deterrence or military retaliation is a more effective means of combating terrorism and why. Of the two, which do you think is more successful in helping societies cope with terrorist attacks?
Below is a Sample Solution.
Remember! This is just a sample. You can get a custom paper from one of our expert writers.
Explain whether you think deterrence or military retaliation is a more effective means of combating terrorism and why.
Silke states , ” It is probably fair to say that Western democracies , in general , have not rushed to embrace military force as a standard response to terrorism . ” This has changed over the years , and I think that western civilizations are finding out that the only way to keep their citizens safe is to confront these acts is head on . Silke states , ” Military deterrence is a common assumption , both in security and public spheres , that military retaliations in response to terrorism can be an effective way to deter future acts of violence . ” Military retaliation has been the way that we ‘ve addressed terrorism in this modern age . If a terrorist commits an act of aggression on our country , we will find out what organization was responsible and act accordingly .