Discuss your thoughts about the ethics of using informed consent vs. blinding the subjects to the expected outcomes of the intervention. Should they be told? How much should they be told? How would the placebo effect be impacted if subjects are told which intervention is being applied to them?
Below is a Sample Solution.
Remember! This is just a sample. You can get a custom paper from one of our expert writers.
Under ethical standards participants need to be informed of what experiments they’re participating in. The issue comes when certain social experiments require the participant to be blinded of what the testing variable is. So while it is unethical to never tell participants what the true testing variable is. I believe a nice middle ground is telling them right after. as long as there’s no danger to their physical or mental well-being. That is after all why we have board of ethics committeeies.
They should always be told beforehand in writing with opportunity to opt out.
They should be told about the ones overseeing the experiment. And parameters that closely resemble the actual thing they’re testing.
When subjects are told what control group they are in, The self-reporting the participant does as part of the study might be skewed by the participant trying to acclamate to the intervention instead of the variables being the factor for the ratings improving or worsening depending on the study.