Read and discuss Bringing Research to Life on page 187 of your text. Develop investigative questions that could have been used to guide Jason and Sara’s mechanical observation study. Respond to at least two of your fellow students’ postings
Below is a Sample Solution.
Remember! This is just a sample. You can get a custom paper from one of our expert writers.
Establishing causality is difficult whether conclusions have been derived inductively or deductively . Explain and elaborate on the implications of this statement . The essential element of causation is that ” A ” produces ” B ” or ” A ” forces ” B ” to occur . An A – B causality can never be demonstrated with certainty . Because casual linkage can not be deductively demonstrated , on the other hand deductive conclusions are unlike influenced empirical conclusions . These are statements of the probability that ” A ” produces ” B ” based on what is observed and measured ( Cooper , Schindler ) . Why is ascribing causality more difficult when conclusions have been reached through induction ? The hypothesis is used to explain inductively any sort of puzzling condition . The hypothesis is used to further facts in a deduction to seek conformation or denial of the hypothesis conclusions is probabilistic and can not be demonstrated with accuracy . Correlation does not imply causation illustrate the point with examples from business . The method of agreement from the text says the method of agreement might be the problem of occasional high absenteeism on