In preparation for this discussion, review the first three required videos for this week. These videos set the stage for your understanding of the readings and will help you understand the relationships between responding agencies and the potential personality conflicts during emergencies. Explain the difference between normal and crisis decision making. Describe how decision makers use the “Boyd Cycle” to make timely and effective crisis decisions? Why is the Boyd Cycle effective when making decisions in a crisis situation like responding to hazardous events and determining an appropriate response? Your initial post should be at least 250 words in length. Support your claims with examples from the required material(s) and/or other scholarly resources, and properly cite any references.
Below is a Sample Solution.
Remember! This is just a sample. You can get a custom paper
from one of our expert writers.
Normal decision making allows for all aspects of a problem to be examined and compared, risksand rewards of each alternative is weighed before a final decision is made and implemented(Huber, 2012).It is a well thought out strategy where time may not be of the essence.Crisisdecision making is essentially making decisions and taking action on the fly.There is notenough time to decide, or weigh the risks and rewards, before making a final decision.Decisionshave to be made with little information that is provided.The Boyd cycle or OODOA (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act), is a decision making processemergency responders use when dealing with a situation or hazard.It was developed by ColonelJohn Boyd, an Air Force pilot.The process involves emergency responders observing thehazardous event, orienting themselves to their surroundings and the hazards, then deciding on thebest course of action to mitigate the hazardous event before acting upon their decision.It’s a