how-to-write-narrative-essay

Ashford BUS 690 Week 2 Assignment

December 18, 2020

Global Financial Meltdown

 

Watch the movie Global financial meltdown – One of the best financial documentary films (please note the movie is two hours and 49 minutes in length, so allocate some time to watch it during the week prior to writing your Week Two paper).

 

  • Pick five main reasons that caused the financial collapse of 2008 supporting it with the evidence described in the documentary and outside sources. Please ensure to provide the analysis using both domestic and international examples, as described in the documentary.

  • Perform a SWOT analysis for at least two financial companies presented in the movie as they started to attempt the recovery immediately after the global financial meltdown.

  • Based on your reading and the SWOT analysis in step 1, provide at least two recommendations to a typical financial company that will help them to succeed in the current industry climate.

  • How is the concept of social responsibility correlated to the events of global financial meltdown and was one of the reasons behind the meltdown deterioration of corporate responsibility?

    Reminder. Capstone Project – Week Two. By the end of Week Two, you should have completed your research overview and the identification of industry boundaries.

    Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

    Reference:

    Rebel Mystic. (2013, November 23). Global financial meltdown – One of the best financial documentary films[Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQzEWeGJLP0

    ◦This video will be required for your Week Two assignment (this documentary is 2:49:15 in length, so please plan accordingly since you will have to watch it in its entirety prior to writing your Week Two paper).

     

    Grading Rubric

    Total Possible Score: 10.00

    Pick Five Main Reasons Which Caused the Financial Collapse of 2008 Supporting it With the Evidence Described in the Documentary and Outside Sources.

    Total: 1.00

    Distinguished – Accurately selects five reasons for the cause of the financial collapse of 2008. Expertly supports the selection with evidence from documentary and outside sources.

    Proficient – Selects five reasons for the cause of the financial collapse of 2008. Supports the selection with evidence from documentary and outside sources.

    Basic – Selects five reasons for the cause of the financial collapse of 2008. Partially supports the selection with evidence from documentary and outside sources.

    Below Expectations – Selects less than five reasons for the cause of the financial collapse of 2008. Attempts to support the selection with evidence from documentary and outside sources.

    Non-Performance – The selection of five reasons for the financial collapse of 2008, the supporting evidence and analysis utilizing domestic and international examples is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

     

    Provides the Analysis Using Both Domestic and International Examples, as Described in the Documentary

    Total: 1.00

    Distinguished – Skillfully analyzes using domestic and international examples.

    Proficient – Analyzes using domestic and international examples.

    Basic – Incompletely analyzes using domestic and international examples.

    Below Expectations – Incompletely analyzes using domestic and international examples.

    Non-Performance – The selection analysis utilizing domestic and international examples is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

     

    Perform A SWOT Analysis for At Least Two Financial Companies Presented in The Movie as They Started to Attempt The Recovery Immediately After the Global Financial Meltdown

    Total: 3.00

    Distinguished – Thoroughly performs a SWOT analysis for two organizations as they began to attempt recovery after the Global Financial Meltdown.

    Proficient – Performs a SWOT analysis for two organizations as they began to attempt recovery after the Global Financial Meltdown.  Some details are missing.

    Basic – Partially performs a SWOT analysis for two organizations as they began to attempt recovery after the Global Financial Meltdown. Many details are missing.

    Below Expectations – Attempts to perform a SWOT analysis for two organizations as they began to attempt recovery after the Global Financial Meltdown. Significant details are missing.

    Non-Performance – The SWOT analysis for two organizations as they began to attempt recovery after the Global Financial Meltdown is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

     

    Provide at Least Two Recommendations to a Typical Financial Company That Will Help Them To Succeed in The Current Industry Climate

    Total: 2.00

    Distinguished – Adeptly Provides at least two recommendations based on the previous SWOT analysis that would assist the company in succeeding in the current global climate.

    Proficient – Provides at least two recommendations based on the previous SWOT analysis that would assist the company in succeeding in the current global climate. Some details are missing.

    Basic – Proximately provides at least two recommendations based on the previous SWOT analysis that would assist the company in succeeding in the current global climate. Many details are missing.

    Below Expectations – Attempts to provide at least two recommendations based on the previous SWOT analysis that would assist the company in succeeding in the current global climate. Significant details are missing.

    Non-Performance – The two recommendations based on the previous SWOT analysis that would assist the company in succeeding in the current global climate are either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

     

    Explain How Concept of Social Responsibility Correlated to the Events of the Financial Meltdown and Was One of the Reasons Behind the Meltdown’s Deterioration of Social Responsibility

    Total: 2.00

    Distinguished – Adroitly explains how the concept of social responsibility correlated to the events of the meltdown. Aptly illustrates why social responsibility was one of the reasons behind the meltdown.

    Proficient – Explains how the concept of social responsibility correlated to the events of the meltdown. Illustrates why social responsibility was one of the reasons behind the meltdown. Some details are missing.

    Basic – Fractionally explains how the concept of social responsibility correlated to the events of the meltdown. Briefly illustrates why social responsibility was one of the reasons behind the meltdown. Many details are missing.

    Below Expectations – Attempts to explain how the concept of social responsibility correlated to the events of the meltdown. Does not illustrate why social responsibility was one of the reasons behind the meltdown. Significant details are missing.

    Non-Performance – The explanation of how the concept of social responsibility correlated to the financial events of the meltdown and reasoning behind the deterioration is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

     

    Critical Thinking: Evidence

    Total: 0.20

    Distinguished – Employs persuasive and applicable information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.

    Proficient – Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic.

    Basic – Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic. 

    Below Expectations – Presents information from external sources, but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects to apply such information toward the analysis of the topic.

    Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

     

    Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

    Total: 0.20

    Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

    Proficient – Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

    Basic – Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

    Below Expectations – Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

    Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

     

    Written Communication: APA Formatting

    Total: 0.20

    Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

    Proficient – Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

    Basic – Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

    Below Expectations – Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

    Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

     

    Written Communication: Page Requirement

    Total: 0.20

    Distinguished – The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

    Proficient – The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

    Basic – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

    Below Expectations – The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

    Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

     

    Written Communication: Resource Requirement

    Total: 0.20

    Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

    Proficient – Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

    Basic – Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

    Below Expectations – Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

    Non-Performance – The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

     

     

PLEASE NOTE: THIS NEEDS TO BE 100% ORIGINAL, NO RE-USED OR RECYCLED PAPERS, MY INSTRUCTOR HAS A STRICT PLAGERISM POLICY!!!!